11.04.2011 12:49, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > Dimitry, how is it related with internals of isc_db_handle? > May be you mean some other structure?
No, this is exactly the structure I had on my mind along with isc_tr_handle, isc_stmt_handle, etc. They all were pointers to structures before became artificial handles. And they were passed to API functions without problems in the similar way. > To deal with results (and parameters) users always had to work with > XSQLDA members. You are talking here not about XSQLDA. XSQLDA was used as an example of "everything was good in the past". You are talking about using structures (actually, pointers to them) in new API, right? Passing pointers to structure to interfaces doesn't mean that user has do work with these structures' members directly, AFAIU. -- SY, SD. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xperia(TM) PLAY It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. And it wants your games. http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel