11.04.2011 12:49, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> Dimitry, how is it related with internals of isc_db_handle?
> May be you mean some other structure?

   No, this is exactly the structure I had on my mind along with isc_tr_handle, 
isc_stmt_handle, etc. They all were pointers to structures before became 
artificial 
handles. And they were passed to API functions without problems in the similar 
way.

> To deal with results (and parameters) users always had to work with
> XSQLDA members.

   You are talking here not about XSQLDA. XSQLDA was used as an example of 
"everything was 
good in the past". You are talking about using structures (actually, pointers 
to them) in 
new API, right? Passing pointers to structure to interfaces doesn't mean that 
user has do 
work with these structures' members directly, AFAIU.

-- 
   SY, SD.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xperia(TM) PLAY
It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
And it wants your games.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to