04.04.2013 19:58, Leyne, Sean wrote: > >> So, the proposition is simple: add ability for engine to distinguish such >> service fields and not include it into auto expanded list of fields for >> table or >> view at the queries above. I.e. service fields is fully accessible if >> present in >> query text explicitly and "hidden" otherwise. > > Isn't what VIEWs are for?
AFAIU, the point is to add a replication into a schema without requiring to change that schema. I would hate to be forced wrapping my selects into views just to please some replication solution. So no, views are not applicable here. Dmitry ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness. Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the Employer Resources Portal http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
