On 4-4-2013 20:57, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > 04.04.2013 19:41, Björn Reimer wrote: >> >> Can't you realize this with removing select permission for a >> column? Of course it's not yet possible as only update and reference >> are allowed currently. > > IIRC, the SQL spec declares select permissions for columns. And they're > surely intended to throw errors, not to hide something.
But in the case of missing SELECT permissions, I would assume that * would not include those columns that the user has no permission for (can't back that up with a reference to the SQL standard, as I can't find it, or it ignores this). On the other hand: using select * for anything other than ad-hoc queries is bad. Should we support that? Mark -- Mark Rotteveel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness. Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the Employer Resources Portal http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
