28.07.2014 14:12, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > But that's not what only I decide. An argument that for a person who > used to work with ISC API for a long time change to current fb3 API is > simpler than to JDBC one remains present.
As I said once, it is simpler to adapt ISC API for new FB features than to rewrite application to a new API. Sp far you haven't introduced them much enough to consider using new API. > If we decide that having JDBC as a main firebird interface is a good > idea as a possible solution not (almost not) delaying FB3 release may be > used the following. Logically what FB3 interface does is very close to > JDBC. We can rename interfaces in Provider.h to make them match the > close-most JDBC interface (i.e. IAttachment becomes Connection, > IStatement => PreparedStatement, etc.) which will help build in next > version an interface which meets JDBC requirements at the same time > remaining compatible with what we have now. I wouldn't care about compatibility with what you have now. -- WBR, SD. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Infragistics Professional Build stunning WinForms apps today! Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
