On 10/08/2014 09:48, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 10.08.2014 5:09, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>>From this pointer, however, the vtable is not compatible with C++.
>    If class layout in FPC is incompatible with C++, it is FPC problem.
>    They must either fix their layout or implement compatibility envelope. At 
> least they 
> still can use old ISC API. As Dmitry said, there is nothing in new API that 
> worth migrating.
>    I see no point to waste time on Firebird side postponing FB 3.0 release 
> even further.
> 

Do I understand correctly that the existing FB 2.5 C API will therefore
remain supported and updated with new features for each FB release?

If not, it seems quite drastic to require C++ compatibility for
languages that may not even have C++ compatibility envelopes and would
negate the points raised in this thread about making it easy for other
languages/new users to write OO (or whatever) drivers for their environment.

Thank you.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to