On 10/08/2014 10:40, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 10.08.2014 10:34, Reinier Olislagers wrote: >> If not, it seems quite drastic to require C++ compatibility for >> languages that may not even have C++ compatibility envelopes > > Compatibility and interoperability are right things. Implementing them is > a gain for > every compiler/language in the world. >
Thank you, that tells me enough. Of course, my view is that it should be the other way round: FB should be compatible with languages, but your answer is clear enough. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
