Ok, so, you mean I should try with the new 2.0+ provider? I mean, we are having
the same problems with the "server" (not the embedded one).
Our intention is to continue using Firebird as our primary target database, so
we'll really like to outperform other SCM systems using Fb as we do using SQL
Server.
pablo
----- Original Message -----
From: Carlos
To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird scalability under heavy load
Hello:
We have to continue using .NET 1.1 that's why we didn't move to a newer
provider.
Ok, it maybe a provider problem, in version 2.0+ there are several changes in
the embedded server support some of them to solver performance problems ( that
if i remember well they are not applied to 1.7, some of the changes was
contributued by a provider user time ago )
--
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Firebird-net-provider mailing list
Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Firebird-net-provider mailing list
Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
