Hi Pablo, Thank you for publishing your numbers.
> On the other hand, in my test, the embedded server is slower than the > "external" one: 444s to complete the embedded vs 291 the "external". > Just to give some data to compare: using SQL Server the same test > (exactly the same code base) requires 198 seconds. The interesting > thing is that the test with only one client (instead of 20) is faster > with the Fb backend than the SQL Server one. Maybe it is not an issue > with the provider but firebird itself, although the time taken to > marshal and unmarshal looks like a possible "culprit". Were you using SQL Server 2005? Which version were you using? I'm interested in comparing Firebird against SQL Server Express. Steve ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
