On 1/13/08, pablosantosluac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the other hand, in my test, the embedded server is slower than the
> "external" one: 444s to complete the embedded vs 291 the "external". Just to
> give some data to compare: using SQL Server the same test (exactly the same
> code base) requires 198 seconds. The interesting thing is that the test with
> only one client (instead of 20) is faster with the Fb backend than the SQL
> Server one. Maybe it is not an issue with the provider but firebird itself,
> although the time taken to marshal and unmarshal looks like a possible
> "culprit".
Well the "external" is native you can save some time spent in embedded
to pass data to/from dll library.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (Microsoft Student Partner)
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
Firebird-net-provider mailing list
Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
