On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 21:44, Kjell Rilbe <kjell.ri...@datadia.se> wrote:
> I would assume that those who are still on 2.0 for various reasons would
> find it rather disappointing if 2.0 were to be dropped completely. Might
> be a reason to switch away from FB?
>
> For me personally, our project is on 3.5 so as long as 3.5 is supported
> we're happy. Also, I suppose we would be able to upgrade to 4.0 as soon
> as ECO (www.capableobjects.com) supports it.
I think you don't understand the relation between .NET 3.5 and .NET
2.0. The 3.5 is just extended 2.0, the runtime is the same as well as
the base libraries. What I'm talking about is to drop just 2.0
support, but keep 3.5. i.e. using .NET 4 and .NET 3.5's features.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (CTO x2develop.com)
http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Firebird-net-provider mailing list
Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
