On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:31, Kjell Rilbe <[email protected]> wrote:
> On the one hand, you say that 3.0 and 3.5 are just extensions to 2.0,
> which would seem to indicate that dropping 2.0 support would imply also
> dropping 3.0 and 3.5 support.
>
> But on the other hand you say the opposite: that you intend to drop only
> 2.0 support, but keep 3.5 (and 3.0?) support.
>
> Can you clarify, just make sure I (and possibly others) don't
> misunderstand you?
Well to make it absolutely clear, let's talk about code. :) I'm
thinking about dropping the NET_20 conditional build, hence it will
not be buildable on .NET 2.0 only. The .NET 3.5 will be still
supported.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (CTO x2develop.com)
http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Firebird-net-provider mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
