Yes Jira, but this makes the assumption that every web host out there currently supports 3.5 hosting, which they do not all seem to offer as default at present. Many hosts still only offer 2.0 as standard, and are only just starting to make migrations up to 3.5 hosting offerings.
Whislt I can understand the desire to support the newer releases only, we do have to bare in mind the reality of the hosting environments on which we depend on the website to run within. For me, that's the real issue. When the hosts start going higher framework by default, which many don't see as beneficial to them as generally it increases running web applications memory consumption when compared to 2.0 web applications, you can see they think they will be running less per machine on which they provide hosting. I can see both sides of the argument, but I don't think that dropping support for 2.0 only in the short term will be beneficial. Kind regards, Scott :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
