sir_brizz wrote: > Sorry, but what does 8,000 beta users have to do with anything (and > how is such a number tracked, anyway? I've downloaded Firebug alphas/ > betas from at least 5 unique locations and I'm sure many others have > done the same)? The people posting here are the people that care about > Firebug development, and the ratio represented should, roughly, > correlate back to that entire 8,000. If not, then what use is any > statistical analysis in the world today? They wouldn't do it if the > methods weren't mostly proven. Frankly, if satisfaction rate is > anywhere near 50%, I would see changing the activation model as an > utter failure and complete waste of time (I'm sorry to say). > > The current functionality is overcomplicated and inconvenient. Here's > how I explained it to a friend (and this is all true based on my > testing of 1.4b3): > > you click the bug, it turns on for the current tab > you refresh, and all the panels work for the current page > oh, but first you have to right click the bug and say "enable all > panels" > if you click the bug then firebug will stay open on that tab > if you want to hide the panel, you have to click minimize not the x > [confusing] > if you mistakenly click the x, you have to then click the bug, refresh > the page, then minimize > if it's minimized and you go to another page, it disables > if you go back to a page it was enabled on, it re-enables > but of course if you hit the x on accident, it forgets that setting > > Okay, now let's compare that to 1.3: > > Click bug > check three boxes > click a button > > So, how can we continue to claim this is not more complex? It > absolutely is! > > On Jul 1, 2:32 pm, johnjbarton <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Yes, but you are taking 72% of a tiny fraction of all Firebug users. >>>> We had about 8,000 beta users, so even if 40 people here did not like >>>> it, 40/8000 is only 0.5%, so we have 99.5% satisfied users. Do you >>>> buy that? Me neither, so let's give up trying to count people who >>>> complain. >>>> >>> You're assuming that 100% of the people who didn't like it complained. >>> >> You bet. Any assumption is as good as any other one. Which is why one >> can't use it as a proxy for voting. >> jjb >> > > > > @ sir b i agree at this point..... +1
OMG im sick of reading all of this, just change it to a white and black list, if its on its on, keep it on till you shut it off by clicking the button, K.I.S.S. kara --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
