There is not enough information on the bug report, considering that I don't have a clue what is jetpack.
jjb On Nov 7, 2:16 pm, Hernan Rodriguez Colmeiro <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 05:43, Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > According to my test since Firebug is not compatible with Jetpack > > (0.5, 0.6pre, etc.) since the version 1.4.3. 1.4.2 works fine but, > > 1.4.3, 1.4.4, 1.5.x are not recognized by Jetpack. > > > Seehttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=521078w(ithout any > > activity though). > > I've tested Jetpack 0.6 with Firebug 1.4.2 and 1.5b3, both in Firefox > 3.6b1 and Firefox 3.5.4, and had no luck at all. If you try to code a > jetpack and do console.log() inside it you can't output your debugging > to Firebug, it goes directly into the Firefox Error Console. > > As this is one of the most advertised capabilities of jetpack (that > you can debug in Firebug, not reinventing the wheel), I think we (or > the jetpack developers) should see what's going on. And that bug > report in bugzilla could be the starting point... > > Hernán -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
