JetPack is Mozilla's new easier way to create extensions: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Labs/Jetpack
and https://jetpack.mozillalabs.com/ Version 0.6 was just released (yes, it says 0.4 on the web page above). http://mozillalabs.com/blog/2009/11/announcing-jetpack-0-6-jetpack-gallery/ On Nov 7, 6:28 pm, John J Barton <[email protected]> wrote: > There is not enough information on the bug report, considering that I > don't have a clue what is jetpack. > > jjb > > On Nov 7, 2:16 pm, Hernan Rodriguez Colmeiro <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 05:43, Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > According to my test since Firebug is not compatible with Jetpack > > > (0.5, 0.6pre, etc.) since the version 1.4.3. 1.4.2 works fine but, > > > 1.4.3, 1.4.4, 1.5.x are not recognized by Jetpack. > > > > Seehttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=521078w(ithoutany > > > activity though). > > > I've tested Jetpack 0.6 with Firebug 1.4.2 and 1.5b3, both in Firefox > > 3.6b1 and Firefox 3.5.4, and had no luck at all. If you try to code a > > jetpack and do console.log() inside it you can't output your debugging > > to Firebug, it goes directly into the Firefox Error Console. > > > As this is one of the most advertised capabilities of jetpack (that > > you can debug in Firebug, not reinventing the wheel), I think we (or > > the jetpack developers) should see what's going on. And that bug > > report in bugzilla could be the starting point... > > > Hernán > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
