> I just think Firebug does most things significantly > better and I haven't found the Firefox dev tools to be very usable. Yes, we know that and we want to change that. We also want to make sure that devtools are extensible and existing Firebug extensions can be ported.
Honza On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 4:58:35 PM UTC+1, Carth wrote: > > I was sorry to hear this news because I much prefer Firebug and its > interface to the built-in Firefox dev tools. I have used the Firefox dev > tools on a number of occasions, but I just find that they are missing > little time-saving features and frequently don't work as expected. Things > like editing HTML/CSS and seeing the results immediately, or trying to add > a CSS rule (I have yet to find a way of doing this with the Firefox dev > tools). Or even when trying to debug JavaScript I often find that > breakpoints don't even fire, even though they do in Firebug or Chrome dev > tools. I have to switch to a computer that has my copy of Firefox with > Firebug to actually get anything done. > > I agree that it doesn't make sense to duplicate functionality that already > exists, so I don't know what to say. I just think Firebug does most things > significantly better and I haven't found the Firefox dev tools to be very > usable. > > On Monday, November 10, 2014 2:31:18 PM UTC, Jan Honza Odvarko wrote: >> >> http://bit.ly/1wKR16L >> >> Honza >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/firebug/ffcb6761-b7bd-47f4-b584-664b7f022594%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
