W dniu poniedziałek, 15 grudnia 2014 13:11:10 UTC+1 użytkownik Jan Honza Odvarko napisał: > > On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 9:51:55 PM UTC+1, Dominik Chrástecký wrote: >> >> I'm afraid it will copy not only the good parts but also the bad ones >> which made me switch to Firebug. >> > Can you please provide a list of these "bad parts"? > (so we can avoid copying). > > Honza > > Hi I can give you three examples: 1. In classic Firebug, when you right somewhere inside Style column in HTML tab you can add css rule/inline style to the currently selected tag. 2. One window for each site when working with unpinned version (I think it's called something like that). I really hate both Chrome and FF tools because of that. When I have few sites opened at the same time and I switch between them a lot I always loose track of which tool window is active on second LCD. Firebug doesn't have this problem because it just switch content within the same window. 3. All the features that are at right click menu - exact depends on context. Those two are mine but I think there are much more those small things that makes classic Firebug better for its users. Many are even not noticeable...That's why I tried to use new Firebug for some time but I had to get back to previous version.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/firebug/3dae8f92-4025-41b1-abb5-7dc943834554%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
