At 11:27 31/08/00 -0500, Ron DuFresne wrote:

>Ahh, but Gauntlet was hit a few months back with a remote compromise was
>it not?

let me cite my "guilty" sentence:

"if the event shows that FW1 is vulnerable, then my recommendation
is o switch to another product, such as the Gauntlet (I don't work for NAI,
it simpy happens that I know this one better than others)."

so, that's an "if ... then..." used to present an alternative to the proposed
"if FW1 is bad, then all are bad".



regards,
mouss

-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to