At 11:27 31/08/00 -0500, Ron DuFresne wrote: >Ahh, but Gauntlet was hit a few months back with a remote compromise was >it not? let me cite my "guilty" sentence: "if the event shows that FW1 is vulnerable, then my recommendation is o switch to another product, such as the Gauntlet (I don't work for NAI, it simpy happens that I know this one better than others)." so, that's an "if ... then..." used to present an alternative to the proposed "if FW1 is bad, then all are bad". regards, mouss - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Re: An eye opener for firewall lovers Steven Pierce
- Re: An eye opener for firewall lovers Michael T. Babcock
- Re: An eye opener for firewall lovers Volker Tanger
- Re: An eye opener for firewall lovers mouss
- Re: An eye opener for firewall lovers Chris Tobkin
- Re: An eye opener for firewall lovers mouss
- Re: An eye opener for firewall lovers Ron DuFresne
- Re: An eye opener for firewall lovers Ron DuFresne
- Re: An eye opener for firewall lovers Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: An eye opener for firewall lovers Thomas Lopatic
- Re: An eye opener for firewall lovers mouss
- Re: An eye opener for firewall lovers Thomas Lopatic
- FW1 and other things [was: An eye... mouss
- Re: An eye opener for firewall lo... Ron DuFresne
- Re: An eye opener for firewall lovers Thomas Lopatic
