-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


OC2?

- -
James D. Wilson

"non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem"
    William of Ockham (1285-1347/49)
 

- -----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Steele
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 1999 3:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..)


See the following link, particularly the "stress test" section:

        http://www.data.com/lab_tests/ntfirewalls.html

MSP 2.0 hit 62.7 Mbits/sec with NAT enabled, and Heatseeker Pro hit
96.34
Mbits/sec without NAT.  This is probably far and above many people's
needs.
It's certainly above mine, considering our company's external link is
512KB
:-).  At what speed would your external link have to be in order for a
firewall capable of 62.7 Mbits/s to become a bottleneck?

Interestingly enough, the Raptor and Checkpoint solutions' performance
was
among the lowest, but I'm sure most offices can live with 34 Mbits/s
and
higher throughput quite easily.  I tend to agree with Data
Communications'
stance that Firewall performance is secondary to security or
management.

Regards,
Brian Steele







- -----Original Message-----
From: HOFMAN, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, 12 January, 1999 8:42 PM
Subject: RE: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..)


>James has a point, although no doubt someone will point out that
memory is
>cheap etc. :-)
>
>One thing that I have noticed is that the UNIX flavours tend to have
better
>throughput on similar powerd boxes, eg. 60-85Mbits/s  Whereas NT
often
peaks
>out at 25-35Mbits/s. So I have tended to use UNIX when high volume
traffic
>is expected and NT when the site is an NT site, or only has NT
experience
>available.
>
>No doubt NT will catch up, but it isn't quite there yet from the
throughput
>point of view.
>
>Mark.


- -
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.0.2
Comment: Spammers are NetAbusers - Jail Them With The Other Criminals

iQA/AwUBNpy8bjAufbtGOmgdEQJKtwCfZPNftVqNpyVKrXyg7rv/0UpN6nYAoOAi
S7tQSjwMQSwLsYQcJrl5InFt
=/a5Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to