On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Brian Steele wrote:
[ Curtice Hardy wrote: ]
> >I just don't think that
> >"MS Proxy Server" is a Firewall. Microsoft probably doesn't either! If
> >they did, I am sure their marketing people would call it "Microsoft
> >Firewall"!!
>
> ... so why do they refer to it as a Firewall on the cover for the CD?
beats me. why do they refer to win98 as an operating system?
and, before i drift too far off-topic, does anyone know how to get linux
to reject source-routed packets? any and all methods gratefully accepted.
Tom Yates - Unix Chap
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- RE: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..) James D. Wilson
- Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..) Curtice Hardy
- Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..) Curtice Hardy
- RE: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..) HOFMAN, Mark
- Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..) Brian Steele
- Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..) Curtice Hardy
- Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is... Paul Krumviede
- Re[2]: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is.... Kevin Jiang
- Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..) Brian Steele
- Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..) Curtice Hardy
- Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..) Tom Yates
- Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is... Paul D. Robertson
- RE: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..) Paul Gracy
