How many "firewall features" should a product have to be considered a firewall? (gd&r) Brian -----Original Message----- From: Curtice Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Brian Steele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, 13 January, 1999 7:45 PM Subject: Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..) > > >While it is true that MS Proxy 2.0 outperformed Checkpoint in a test >situation, I would not call the results definitive as far as a performance >test. First I really don't consider MS Proxy 2.0 to be a Firewall; it has >SOME firewall features and that's about it. - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- RE: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..) HOFMAN, Mark
- Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..) Brian Steele
- RE: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is... James D. Wilson
- Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is... Curtice Hardy
- Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is... Curtice Hardy
- RE: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..) HOFMAN, Mark
- Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..) Brian Steele
- Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is... Curtice Hardy
- Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answe... Paul Krumviede
- Re[2]: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer... Kevin Jiang
- Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..) Brian Steele
- Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is... Curtice Hardy
- Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is... Tom Yates
- Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answe... Paul D. Robertson
- RE: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..) Paul Gracy
