>Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 17:15:24 -0500
>From: Kent Hundley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Response to hack attempt?
>
>Hmmm.  Calling a scanning program an "illegal access device" seems like
quite
>a stretch to me, especially if the original statute was referring to
physical
>access.  If that's all they had to hold someone on, I doubt it would even
make
>it to trial.  Of course, given the right judge, I suppose anything is
>possible.

How many have actually made it to trial?  What were the charges?  I
understand that in almost every case it is hard to "shut up" the
braggard^h^h^h^H^h^h^h^h hacker and a plea bargain is made resulting in NO
trial.


-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to