I have minor experience with IBM routers. Very comparable to Cisco in
terms of features, horsepower,etc. They are about 2 years behind Cisco
in terms of voice features and security though, IMO of course.
John Monahan
MIME:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/15/99 11:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ INTERNET
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ INTERNET, (bcc: John Monahan/LDI)
Subject: Re: comparably secure router - input?
I've only played with Bay Networks devices, but they're not as secure as the
Cisco routers.
rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/14/99 06:55:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Rob Walker/SV/AUS/HARCOURT)
Subject: comparably secure router - input?
Greetings,
I have a client who, for reasons they do not wish to share, do
not wish a cisco product for Internet connection. I am a cisco
zealot and can't figure out why, but that is not my issue.
So, my question -- Can someone recommend a router or two
that would compare with security and management features of
Cisco?
Need it to handle split channels off a data/voice shared T1. Since
it is *part* of the firewall structure, it does not have to be the
most secure, but I have not played that much with the other
manufacturers. Also, they do not want to spend a fortune.
thanks
r
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
