According to David Lang: > >why is a hub any better then a switch? > I am not entirely sure it is.... modern switches have very low latencies and the ability to store around 8192 mac addresses (or more, last I looked). A hub just blats the same data out on all ports, that does not scale very well at all. >assuming you use switches in the same places and sizes you would a hub how >does replacing a single hub with a single switch loose you any security? > It probably gives you a little more security but don't rely on it. The major plus is your traffic is no longer shared amongst all the ports so the network will perform a bit better. -- =============================================================================== Brett Lymn, Computer Systems Administrator, BAE SYSTEMS =============================================================================== _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
- Re: Secure lan communication (part 2)? dgillett
- Re: Secure lan communication (part 2)? Paul Robertson
- Re: Secure lan communication (part 2)? dgillett
- Re: Secure lan communication (part 2)? Paul Robertson
- RE: Secure lan communication (part 2)? Jason Lewis
- Re: Secure lan communication (part 2)? dgillett
- Re: Secure lan communication (part 2)? Paul D. Robertson
- RE: Secure lan communication (part 2)? David Lang
- RE: Secure lan communication (part 2)? Brett Lymn
- RE: Secure lan communication (part 2)? David Lang
- Re: Secure lan communication (part 2)? Brett Lymn
- RE: Secure lan communication (part 2)? Paul D. Robertson
- RE: Secure lan communication (part 2)? Paul D. Robertson
- RE: Secure lan communication (part 2)? Ben Nagy
- RE: Secure lan communication (part 2)? Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Secure lan communication (part 2)? Brett Lymn
- Re: Secure lan communication (part 2)? Paul D. Robertson
- RE: Secure lan communication (part 2)? Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Secure lan communication (part 2)? Bernd Eckenfels
