On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Mike Hoskins wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Paul D. Robertson wrote: > > > That's important because someone was just complaining about the dot > > bug w/PIX and Postfix on Postfux-users in the last ~48 hours at a site > > they don't control who couldn't understand that their expensive PIX has a > > bug and not the other guy's cheap Postfix ;) > > Old addage, > > "Don't use what you don't understand. If you do, expect problems (and > little help)."
Which is of no use for people who have to communicate with such sites. It seems to me that Cisco would have at least some ammount of will to try to keep their customers current to keep them on maintenance, if not for other reasons. Guess it's too much to ask for a world where Cisco sends its customers e-mail from a server that detects the bug and sicks the sales reptiles on them. Personally, I think that there's some culpability from the whole "appliance" moniker. Appliance my butt- it's a pre-configured computer. I've yet to have to update code on my VCR, fridge or TV. Hmmm- maybe it's time for a long rant... Paul ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions [EMAIL PROTECTED] which may have no basis whatsoever in fact." _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
