> > > The current incantation (ISA Server 2000) has passed ICSA Labs > > > certification[1] as an actual firewall, and it does work. The last two > > > attempts in the product line certainly EARNED such scorn- the current > > > implementation should probably be evaluated for function seperately- it's > > > the third product in the line AFAIR. > > > > This is incorrect. ISA is *not* MS Proxy, just as Exchange is not MS Mail. > > I didn't say it was- please *read* it again "in the product line" in this > case doesn't say "of the product" it says "in the product line." > > > Given your insistence on "traditional" terminology, I find it hard to > > believe that you're "accidentally" comparing a proxy to a hybrid firewall > > and calling them the same thing. And I believe the word you were looking for > > It's in the same line, the product manager position is the same, the group > is the same, the individual product manager isn't, the actual product > isn't, but they are indeed in the same line. > > Checkpoint 1.0 is in the same product line as Checkpoint is now, even > though one is a packet filter and one contains hybrid features (proxy-like > "security servers.") > > > into your posts (1). ISA *is* a firewall. > > Never said it wasn't a firewall, get over it. >
Oh, goody, here we go again with your "I didn't really say that; *my* ever-changing interpretation of the English language is correct while yours must be wrong because you dared disagree with me" garbage. You really need a good therapist or a little Xanax. You're wrong, Paul . ISA is NOT part of the MS Proxy product line. Period. *You* need to get over it. Since there is clearly no chance of logical discourse with you, I'm finished with this discussion. You go right on deluding yourself that you didn't say what you said. Laura _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
