Dear Arturo,
Thank you very much for responding to my post (nobody else did not reacted to the UCLA finding). Even more thanks for directing me to the Neuroskeptic blog - the real discussion about the UCLA finding took place only there. You are incorrect stating that the "paper about memory transfer has been highly criticized". On the contrary, they are embarrassed by the finding and by the crash it brings to the existing dogmas, but they are busy trying to get an explanation, (and they cannot do this because they are deprived of such critical things as a notion of information, and information representation, and information processing). Nevertheless, they recall a similar case "citing evidence that 'naked' RNA can become encapsulated inside packages called exosomes <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exosome_(vesicle)> and that this could allow them to enter cells". (I used this evidence to justify the idea of information transfer among astrocytes and neurons, where information is reified as a molecular text string). Never mind. Again, many thanks for paying attention to important recent discoveries overlooked in FIS discussions. Emanuel.
_______________________________________________ Fis mailing list Fis@listas.unizar.es http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
