I tried to download using git, but I'm getting an error, and I'm not  
sure what I did wrong.

I did this:
git clone git://github.com/benhoskings/fish
cd fish
./configure
make
sudo make install

but, calling fish gives me an error:
~/D/f/fish> /usr/local/bin/fish
fish: Job 1, '/usr/local/bin/fish' terminated by signal SIGBUS  
(Misaligned address error)

?

On 2 Apr 2010, at 13:03, David Frascone wrote:

> Right. I was in the same boat. Use my patch and the fish installed  
> seq will work for you.
>
> -Dave
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 2, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Michael Lachmann <[email protected]>  
> wrote:
>
>> The seq that I use is /sw/bin/seq, which seems to have been installed
>> by fish:
>> ---
>> #!/usr/bin/env fish
>> #
>> # Fallback implementation of the seq command
>> #
>> # seq.  Generated from seq.in by configure.
>>
>> set -l from 1
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> ---
>>
>> The error (fish: invalid option -- 1) seems  to be generated before
>> the script is ever called, by fish itself.
>> So, when the script is invoked, fish is called, with the arguments  
>> (10
>> -1 5), and it generates the error.
>>
>> I think when fish is invoked for a script, it shouldn't parse the
>> arguments that are meant for the script...
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>
>> On 2 Apr 2010, at 8:09, Isaac Dupree wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/02/10 01:31, David Frascone wrote:
>>>> Found and fixed.  There were several issues.  First, most people
>>>> who type
>>>> seq are really running seq on their host.  Fish will only use the
>>>> builtin if
>>>> it doesn't find it locally.  Use 'seq --version' to see what I  
>>>> mean.
>>>
>>> of course seq is /usr/bin/seq ! (or wherever it is on your path.)  
>>> What
>>> does it have to do with Fish? How can Fish have a possibly-a- 
>>> builtin,
>>> possibly-not?(for me, 'type seq' just says 'seq is /usr/bin/ 
>>> seq' ...)
>>> Isn't it against Fish's philosophy to duplicate external tools that
>>> don't need to be built into a shell?
>>>
>>> Is Mac OS X 'seq' broken, under-featured, (or nonexistent?)?  I
>>> would be
>>> unsurprised.  In 10.3 (the last version I used regularly), I know  
>>> they
>>> shipped a version of 'find' that enjoyed segfaulting (or some weird
>>> error, I forget exactly) when you forgot that their version of the
>>> 'find' command didn't support omitting the path bit (you had to pass
>>> '.'). Admittedly, I think they just copied the tools from BSD, but
>>> that
>>> doesn't mean they were good tools...
>>>
>>> -Isaac
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
>>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
>>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Fish-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fish-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Fish-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users

Reply via email to