Ahhhh -- I just looked, and there is a /usr/bin/gseq, which does the same
thing. So, it does exist, it's just named differently :)
-Dave
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Isaac Dupree <[email protected]
> wrote:
> On 04/03/10 10:10, David Frascone wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure I understand your point. Are you saying that seq should
>> have been implemented with bash instead of fish? Or bash instead of bc?
>> Or that we shouldn't use fish at all, but use bash instead?
>>
>> I know in the man pages of zsh they say that zsh is a command prompt and
>> strictly differentiate command prompts from scripting languages, citing
>> security isseus, code coverage, and collective knowledge as reasons for
>> leaving bash around for scripts. I do feel the same way about fish, but,
>> without understanding your point, I'm not sure if I've addressed your
>> comments.
>>
>
> eh, I was just ranting....Actually I am confused by why there isn't any
> "official" version of 'seq' for Mac OS X. I think one should exist.
>
> -Isaac
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Fish-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
