Hello Charles, thank you very much for your answer.
It´s clear now. Many greetings. Rosika Am 01.08.20 um 20:30 schrieb Charles Gould: > I experienced the same confusion with the bind command. Invoking it without > arguments lists all the existing bindings. > > Charles > -------- Original Message -------- > On Aug 1, 2020, 12:08 PM, Christian wrote: > >> Hi altogether, >> >> I was going to use the history command and accidentally typed just "history" >> (without any options or sub-commands). >> I got the full history of my fish-commands. >> >> However "help" gave me just these command variations: >> >> Synopsis >> >> history search [ --show-time ] [ --case-sensitive ] [ --exact | --prefix | >> --contains ] [ --max=n ] [ --null ] [ "search string"... ] >> history delete [ --show-time ] [ --case-sensitive ] [ --exact | --prefix | >> --contains ] "search string"... >> history merge >> history save >> history clear >> history ( -h | --help ) # >> >> No mention of the usage of just typing "history". Or might the last entry >> history ( -h | --help) be interpreted as to be used without any parameters >> as well? >> >> So basically my question is: is it legitimate to just run "history" without >> any parameters? Because it seems to work. >> >> Thanks a lot in advance. >> >> Greetings. >> Rosika _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
