Am 01.08.20 um 22:13 schrieb Johannes Altmanninger: > On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 06:08:42PM +0200, Christian wrote: >> Hi altogether, >> >> I was going to use the *history* command and accidentally typed just >> "history" (without any options or sub-commands). >> I got the full history of my fish-commands. >> >> However "help" gave me just these command variations: >> >> /Synopsis// >> // >> //history search [ --show-time ] [ --case-sensitive ] [ --exact | >> --prefix | --contains ] [ --max=n ] [ --null ] [ "search string"... ]// >> //history delete [ --show-time ] [ --case-sensitive ] [ --exact | >> --prefix | --contains ] "search string"...// >> //history merge// >> //history save// >> //history clear// >> //history ( -h | --help ) # / >> >> No mention of the usage of just typing "history". Or might the last >> entry _/history ( -h | --help)/_ be interpreted as to be used without >> any parameters as well? >> >> So basically my question is: is it legitimate to just run "history" >> without any parameters? Because it seems to work. >> >> Thanks a lot in advance. >> >> Greetings. >> Rosika > The help for the "search" subcommand says > > This is the default operation if no other operation is specified. > > You're doing a search with no search string! I'll change the synopsis to use > "history [ search ] ... " so it's clear that this is optional. > >> _______________________________________________ >> Fish-users mailing list >> Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
Hi Johannes, thanks a lot for your reply. > I'll change the synopsis to use "history [ search ] ... " so it's clear that this is optional Great. That´s really nice of you. For me it was important to learn that I wasn´t doing anything wrong. Many greetngs. Rosika
_______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users