Am 01.08.20 um 22:13 schrieb Johannes Altmanninger:
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 06:08:42PM +0200, Christian wrote:
>> Hi altogether,
>>
>> I was going to use the *history* command and accidentally typed just
>> "history"  (without any  options or sub-commands).
>> I got the full history of my fish-commands.
>>
>> However "help" gave me just these command variations:
>>
>> /Synopsis//
>> //
>> //history search [ --show-time ] [ --case-sensitive ] [ --exact |
>> --prefix | --contains ] [ --max=n ] [ --null ] [ "search string"... ]//
>> //history delete [ --show-time ] [ --case-sensitive ] [ --exact |
>> --prefix | --contains ] "search string"...//
>> //history merge//
>> //history save//
>> //history clear//
>> //history ( -h | --help )  # /
>>
>> No mention of the usage of just typing "history".  Or might the last
>> entry  _/history ( -h | --help)/_  be interpreted as to be used without
>> any parameters as well?
>>
>> So basically my question is: is it legitimate to just run "history"
>> without any parameters? Because it seems to work.
>>
>> Thanks a lot in advance.
>>
>> Greetings.
>> Rosika
> The help for the "search" subcommand says
>
>       This is the default operation if no other operation is specified.
>
> You're doing a search with no search string!  I'll change the synopsis to use
> "history [ search ] ... " so it's clear that this is optional.
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fish-users mailing list
>> Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users

Hi Johannes,


thanks a lot for your reply.

> I'll change the synopsis to use "history [ search ] ... " so it's
clear that this is optional

Great. That´s really nice of you.

For me it was important to learn that I wasn´t doing anything wrong.

Many greetngs.
Rosika


_______________________________________________
Fish-users mailing list
Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users

Reply via email to