I experienced the same confusion with the bind command. Invoking it without
arguments lists all the existing bindings.
Charles
-------- Original Message --------
On Aug 1, 2020, 12:08 PM, Christian wrote:
> Hi altogether,
>
> I was going to use the history command and accidentally typed just "history"
> (without any options or sub-commands).
> I got the full history of my fish-commands.
>
> However "help" gave me just these command variations:
>
> Synopsis
>
> history search [ --show-time ] [ --case-sensitive ] [ --exact | --prefix |
> --contains ] [ --max=n ] [ --null ] [ "search string"... ]
> history delete [ --show-time ] [ --case-sensitive ] [ --exact | --prefix |
> --contains ] "search string"...
> history merge
> history save
> history clear
> history ( -h | --help ) #
>
> No mention of the usage of just typing "history". Or might the last entry
> history ( -h | --help) be interpreted as to be used without any parameters as
> well?
>
> So basically my question is: is it legitimate to just run "history" without
> any parameters? Because it seems to work.
>
> Thanks a lot in advance.
>
> Greetings.
> Rosika
_______________________________________________
Fish-users mailing list
Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
