[This message was posted by Majkara Majka of me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to the "FAST Protocol" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/46. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/2e16b730 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Simple: 1. People care about speed, simplicity and correct, and FAST is already slowing, complicating and messing up things. This is all a design flaw. 2. Demonstrating a full feature set goes completely against what every major exchange or ECN did. No one cares about it and does their own thing TM. 3. People lie in benchmarks. 4. You need to develop something that doesn't rely on bits, simple as that. No hardware architecture in the world was designed for it, apart from old telephone systems. Someone should have foreseen that. 5. You should skip everything, and see the existing mess with major proponents and adopters (it is already mega huge). 6. Fixing FIX via FASTFix has a full-fidelity nail and hammer analogy. [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
