[This message was posted by Majkara Majka of me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to the 
"FAST Protocol" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/46. You can 
reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/91584e9a - PLEASE DO 
NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]

Simple: 

1. People care about speed, simplicity and correctmess, and FAST is already 
slowing, complicating and messing up things. This is all a design flaw. 

2. Demonstrating a full feature set goes completely against what every major 
exchange or ECN did. No one cares about it and does their own thing TM. 

3. People lie in benchmarks. 

4. You need to develop something that doesn't rely on bits, simple as that. No 
hardware architecture in the world was designed for it, despite appereances, 
apart from maybe some ancient telephone systems. Someone should have foreseen 
that. 

5. You should skip everything, and see the existing mess with major proponents 
and adopters (it is already mega huge). 

6. Fixing FIX via FASTFix has a full-fidelity nail and hammer analogy.

7. The world economy, software included, does not need another unnecessary 
complication.

Regards,
Troll

[You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Financial Information eXchange" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to