[This message was posted by Rolf Andersson of Pantor Engineering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to the "FAST Protocol" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/46. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/b8ec22d6 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Please be specific or be silent /Rolf > Simple: > > 1. People care about speed, simplicity and correctmess, and FAST is > already slowing, complicating and messing up things. This is all a > design flaw. > > 2. Demonstrating a full feature set goes completely against what > every major exchange or ECN did. No one cares about it and does > their own thing TM. > > 3. People lie in benchmarks. > > 4. You need to develop something that doesn't rely on bits, simple as > that. No hardware architecture in the world was designed for it, > despite appereances, apart from maybe some ancient telephone systems. > Someone should have foreseen that. > > 5. You should skip everything, and see the existing mess with major > proponents and adopters (it is already mega huge). > > 5. Fixing FIX via FASTFix has a full-fidelity nail and hammer analogy. > > 6. The world economy, software included, does not need another > unnecessary complication. > > Regards, Troll [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/FIX-Protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
