[This message was posted by Joakim Johansson of Tbricks <[email protected]> to the "FAST Protocol" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/46. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/feb8460e - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
I must say it is quite difficult to follow the line of reasoning of this rant which is ripe with personal insults rather than constructive criticism. One random comment is that although in general, serialization can be a limiting factor, it is clearly not the case here, as data partitioning can be - and is - used where relevant by exchanges (such as the CME and DB), thus parallelizing the FAST streams on a more appropriate level. It is possible that there are some valid points in here (and I'm sure any good suggestions for improvement would be seriously considered), but without a civil tone and a structured approach to suggesting improvements, they are headed for the eternal bit-bucket. Joakim > Some bold statements there (and in typical "enlightened by FAST or FIX" > fashion, completely missing out on what should be the primary concern). > [cut] > > > You're Welcome, Le Sake Of Mankind [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.
