[This message was posted by Brandon Yuille of BWY Systems <[email protected]> to the "FAST Protocol" discussion forum at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/46. You can reply to it on-line at http://fixprotocol.org/discuss/read/43e18594 - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY BY MAIL.]
Thanks Dale, Yes it did sound sarcastic to me. I think I was feeling a little sensitive as my implementation of FAST was something I took a great deal of care on building. Which is why I brought up the point I did, as out of the entire FAST spec, the placement of the template id is the only thing that seemed wrong to me. Anyway, thanks again for letting me know there was no harm intended and for the summarization of Majkara's comment. Brandon > Hi Brandon, > > > I'm resigning trying to explain my point. It doesn't seem like anyone > > wants to actually read what I'm saying. > > It sounds like my comment came across with the wrong tone. Sorry. > > When I used the word "respectfully" it was literal. I was not being > sarcastic! Given the other conversation going on [1] I was trying to > make it clear that my statement respected your proposal even though I > was offering a counter argument. > > The point I was trying to make -- putting the PMAP first improves > compression for some cases -- I believe Rolf covered. > > > Dale > > [1] I believe I can summarize Majkara's recent emails in four words > without loss of content: "I don't like FAST." [You can unsubscribe from this discussion group by sending a message to mailto:[email protected]] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Financial Information eXchange" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fix-protocol?hl=en.
