Alex Jones wrote: > I think he might be concerned with audio quality, and doesn't quite > understand what "lossless" really means!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lossless_compression Rick, flac will *always* get you back to the exact original bits you started with. No loss. Never. Using options for more compression might mean more time to encode, but it will *not* lead to any loss in quality. -Eric > On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 07:12 -0700, Mark Rudholm wrote: >> Rick wrote: >>> hmm, let me ask this question, another way... >>> which setting offer the least compression ?. >> Not using it at all. >> >> But why would you want that? What's the goal here? >> _______________________________________________ >> Flac mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac _______________________________________________ Flac mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
