I think he wants to get the most credits on a ratio site. Maybe this relates to Harry Sack's query about the largest possible bitmap attachment.
> Rick, > > Mark asked "why" you want the least amount of compression. I think > we still do not understand your goals. If you can give us a hint at > what you're trying to accomplish in your search for the least amount > of compression, that might help us find the right answer. > > Brian Willoughby > Sound Consulting > > > On Jul 12, 2007, at 13:26, Rick wrote: >> I try to make it easier for you to understand, >> I do understand about lossless format, hence I installed flac, >> second, understanding the setting under the man pages is the key. >> so, I pose a question, which is: >> >> What setting uses the least amount of compression. >> >> flac --best >> or >> flac -1 >> >> Richard >> >> >>> On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 07:12 -0700, Mark Rudholm wrote: >>>> Rick wrote: >>>>> hmm, let me ask this question, another way... >>>>> which setting offer the least compression ?. >>>> >>>> Not using it at all. >>>> >>>> But why would you want that? What's the goal here? > > _______________________________________________ > Flac mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac > _______________________________________________ Flac mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
