Level 1 uses far less compression than level 8. In terms of compression, the lower the "level" the less compression used (and the larger the resulting FLAC file).
Hope that helps. -Brad On 7/12/07, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I try to make it easier for you to understand, I do understand about lossless format, hence I installed flac, second, understanding the setting under the man pages is the key. so, I pose a question, which is: What setting uses the least amount of compression. flac --best or flac -1 Richard On Thursday 12 July 2007 11:08:44 am Alex Jones wrote: > I think he might be concerned with audio quality, and doesn't quite > understand what "lossless" really means! > > On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 07:12 -0700, Mark Rudholm wrote: > > Rick wrote: > > > hmm, let me ask this question, another way... > > > which setting offer the least compression ?. > > > > Not using it at all. > > > > But why would you want that? What's the goal here? > > _______________________________________________ > > Flac mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac _______________________________________________ Flac mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
-- - Brad
_______________________________________________ Flac mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
