if i am not mistaken, jQuery is a framework that makes working with html
tags easier. but you are still stuck with using those tags.

its not a matter of 'can you do it with this language', its a matter of
'what control do i have'. i have always felt that as a developer, you have
less control over how html works, than how flash works. there are greater
and deeper black boxes in html.

i just don't see why people like working in html at all. they took a markup
language, designed to be static and Frankenstein-ed it with javascript and
css to compensate where they should have attempted to create something new.


i don't think the future is bleak at all either. in fact, i think that
flash might end up being used more and more for tools, education, and
visualization. but that's what i am using it for and i am a bit out of
touch with what everyone else is doing.

are there ways that i could effectively create my own 'tag' with its own
attributes and events and use that in lieu of a natvie html tag?



On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Karl DeSaulniers <[email protected]>wrote:

> One word.. jQuery.
>
> In my option it is the next best thing to flash.
> I have been able to recreate most, if not all of my flash pieces with it.
>
> <body> is your canvas. (NOT a reference to HTML5 BTW, think artist canvas
> =)
> <DIV> is your friend. Call it your MovieClip.
> <p> is a helper when layout has text.
> if your daring enough to learn the proper way to use it,
> <table>, <tr> and the good ol <td> can make a sound foundation.
> (Not the going consensus though, I just know how to use them properly.
> most people like to use a table-less design and thats just <DIV>s galore
> with CSS.)
>
> jQuery can create any element you want on the fly (Not sure about the HTML
> tag though,
> never tried. I use php to create any new HTML) and manipulate it (in some
> cases)
> better than flash and an MC. jQuery has not been a memory hoooooogggg like
> flash was for me
> and like I said, I have recreated most of what I did with flash.
>
> Just a very small run-down an there is A LOT more I have not touched on
> that you can utilize.
> The future is not so bleak, IMO.
>
> I just assume let Adobe burry Flash if this is the effort they would put
> towards it.
> I learned Flash much like you. I hated the limitations of HTML.
> Saw flash and asked, why can't HTML do this stuff??
> Well now it can, or I should say, it kind-of always could,
>
> I just didn't know Javascript and CSS...
>
> HTH,
>
> Best,
> Karl
>
> PS: Flash still is my love, but she's left me to figure out who she is. I
> wait with baited breath...
>
> On Jan 13, 2012, at 12:43 PM, Ktu wrote:
>
>  *preamble:*
>>
>> a recent thread got me thinking about my educational experience, and why i
>> love flash so much. i started html, hated it, then tried flash, all in
>> high
>> school. after high school i eventually went to a college for two semesters
>> and learned some c++ and java (java was easier, but understanding the
>> power
>> of c++ was cool).
>>
>> i realized i didn't like html because you couldn't do anything with it. it
>> was just presentation. i wanted to do logic. flash, allowed me to do
>> logic.
>> when i learned html javascript was brand new and my high school teacher
>> knew nothing of it (barely knew anything of anything). so what flash
>> allowed me was a place to immediately make things happen (started just
>> when
>> as2 came out).
>>
>> *problem:*
>>
>> even after you include css, dynamic css, and javascript to html you still
>> have this one problem which is the whole reason i hate html. the
>> presentation layer is black boxed. i think there are two elements to that
>> which need addressing; one being the browser wars, the other being the
>> (imho) new powers of javascript and the html/css standards.
>>
>> each tag we use in html is a black box. i can't change the way it behaves.
>> worse yet, each browser (and os) represent things differently. right off
>> the bat its hard to make a single experience. but these black boxes make
>> innovation harder.
>>
>> ok, so with javascript and such you could build your own 'scroll bar' and
>> 'scrolling content', but you are still confined within the black boxes you
>> are given, and merely using them in a way they weren't initially designed
>> for.
>>
>>
>> how is it that anyone enjoys working in an environment where their ui is
>> so
>> locked down? (or is it?)
>>
>>
>> *haters:*
>>
>> to make comment on flash's ui black box:
>> yes, their display architecture is a black box and we must conform to
>> that.
>> i get that, but the black box in flash ui is more of a foundation to a
>> house that we can't touch. where as i see html as being pre built rooms
>> that we can stitch together.
>>
>>
>>
>> *what's up:*
>>
>> i have not touched html in years; i am biased; i am open minded, am i
>> missing something about html? have they added 'lower level' tags that act
>> more like a foundation?
>> can javascript 'create' new html tags?
>>
>> with the way things are going, i think the global web language will
>> eventually need to have fewer black boxes in the ui (if that's not the
>> case
>> today)
>>
>> ...,?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ktu;
>>
>> The information contained in this message may or may not be privileged
>> and/or confidential. If you are NOT the intended recipient,
>> congratulations, you got mail!
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Flashcoders mailing list
>> [email protected].**com <[email protected]>
>> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/**mailman/listinfo/flashcoders<http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders>
>>
>
> Karl DeSaulniers
> Design Drumm
> http://designdrumm.com
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Flashcoders mailing list
> [email protected].**com <[email protected]>
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/**mailman/listinfo/flashcoders<http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders>
>



-- 
Ktu;

The information contained in this message may or may not be privileged
and/or confidential. If you are NOT the intended recipient,
congratulations, you got mail!
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Reply via email to