Here's a much simpler example than the one I posted earlier. The code
doesn't do anything, but it's simple enough to quickly understand that
(a) the code is syntactically correct and (b) how a compile-time cyclic
dependency is involved.
//-- A.as
class A {
var dependent : B;
}
//-- B.as
class B {
var dependent : A;
}
This fails to compile, giving the same meaningless message noted
previously. Can someone from Macromedia let me know if this bug has been
logged?
- Robert
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders mailing list
[email protected]
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
