but that does not necessarily mean it being grey with green rollover, white background and rounded corners....
On 11/14/05, Nick Weekes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dude, shouldn't you be on a counterstrike server somewhere? ;-) > > I take yer point tho, but my clients usually want their people/customers > to > use software transparently, and that usually means making a combobox look > like a combobox... > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JesterXL > Sent: 14 November 2005 21:18 > To: Flashcoders mailing list > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex Style Flash MX2004 Components > > Oops, did I say that out loud? u$3|3$ r d@ b0mb, i luv da uS3RZ! Plz dem, > j00 g3t teh w1n! > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "JesterXL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Flashcoders mailing list" <flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com> > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 4:15 PM > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex Style Flash MX2004 Components > > > Users? Screw users, they don't pay my bills, the people that want Flex to > look awesome do. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nick Weekes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'Flashcoders mailing list'" <flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com> > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 4:13 PM > Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Flex Style Flash MX2004 Components > > > I disagree...users don't give a damn whether a component is skinned or > not, > but whether it works as a piece of UI. How many different comboboxes do we > need in the world?? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JesterXL > Sent: 14 November 2005 21:06 > To: Flashcoders mailing list > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex Style Flash MX2004 Components > > I find just the opposite; I think it's easier in Flex. > > I'm with you, though. The pendulum has swung too far to the other side. > Pre-Flash MX, it was "no Flash UI assets look the same". Now, post Flex > 1.5 > it's "all Flex apps look the same". > > Mars needs women. Flex needs UI designers. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Johannes Nel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Flashcoders mailing list" <flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com> > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 4:01 PM > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex Style Flash MX2004 Components > > > yeah, they do look better than the IDE ones, but its easier to skin stuff > in > flash than flex from my experience thus far. due to this we are seeing > more > and more apps looking very similiar, which as a non-designer i think > sucks. > > On 11/14/05, JesterXL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The Flex ones look better. Before people realized they were coded > better, > > a > > few wanted the look and feel since it was refined. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dustin Krysak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Flashcoders mailing list" <flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com> > > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 3:48 PM > > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Flex Style Flash MX2004 Components > > > > > > Maybe in case there are aspects of a project developed in both flash > > and flex? > > > > Not sure otherwise. > > > > > > > > On 14-Nov-05, at 12:45 PM, Johannes Nel wrote: > > > > > why???????????????????????? > > > > > > On 11/14/05, Hindman, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >> Nope ... > > >> > > >> http://www.dwuser.com/flexcomponents/ > > >> > > >> -- Jeff Hindman > > >> > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Pete Hotchkiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 10:43 AM > > >> To: 'Flashcoders mailing list' > > >> Subject: [Flashcoders] Flex Style Flash MX2004 Components > > >> > > >> > > >> I have a very vague recollection of somebody somewhere creating a > > >> set of > > >> Flex Styled components for Flash MX2004 - was I dreaming ? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Flashcoders mailing list > > >> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > >> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Flashcoders mailing list > > >> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > >> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > j:pn > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Flashcoders mailing list > > > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Flashcoders mailing list > > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Flashcoders mailing list > > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > > > > > -- > j:pn > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > -- j:pn _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
