I notice between lines 29 & 33 of your convolution version you have pushed a blurFilter into the filterArray - if you remove this from both versions and rely on convolution purely for blurring, as you can observe the effect isn't as pronounced as directly applying a blurFilter - to get an effective blur from a single iteration of a convolution matrix I've found requires a 5x5 matrix or alternatively use multiple iterations which may negate any cpu advantage that a single 3x3 convolution matrix application has?
On 1/31/06, Mike Mountain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks like: > > Convolution = better on PC > Blur = better on mac > > Oh joy.... > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > > Of Cédric Muller > > Sent: 31 January 2006 09:44 > > To: Flashcoders mailing list > > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] ConvolutionFilter performance > > > > I am using Flash 8 on OS X 10.4 > > > > ?? really strange ... > > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
