"Sounds wonderful, why don't you take it a step beyond words and show us js dummies how that would be done? We'd all worship at your shrine."
I don't get the need for hostility, but ok... I have seen javascript that adheres more to OOP standards. If you like OOP, and I do, then that sort of thing might interest you (see DOJO for example). If you don't care for OOP. then no biggie. The truth is, I'm sure I never could have come up with FlashObject. It is a great thing that performs a very useful service. But it isn't OOP, and before it gets adopted as a universal standard, which seems to be a direction people are going in, I thought it might make sense to simply and dispassionately comment on that. So I did. Anyway, if I came off as pompous, I'm sorry about that. I seriously have nothing but admiration for javascript and the people who write it. It's hard to write object-oriented javascript, but it can be done, and I think it's worth the effort. Jim Kremens _______________________________________________ [email protected] To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
