btw one more compilaltion error circumventing hack that seems to work:
[yourObj][0]
;-S
greetz
JC
On 7/24/07, Danny Kodicek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > That's a fair point. It's more the principle of the thing - it was
> > > frustrating not to be *able* to make it strict. But yes, leaving off
> > > the :Object would be a better solution.
> >
> > Well, you can't do argument overloading in AS2 (nor AS3, I believe), so
> > you can't have pure polymorphism in Flash the way you can in other
> > languages like Java. Such is life.
> >
> > Alternatively, you could write your own class for the argument that
> could
> > be an array or an object and then cast it strictly as that class.
>
> Well, it would work just as well to have
>
> Class StrictArray extends Array {
> }
>
> Ought to work perfectly (although I'd be interested to see whether bracket
> access still works). But yes, why bother? :)
>
> Danny
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
> Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
> Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
> http://www.figleaf.com
> http://training.figleaf.com
>
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
