On 8/14/07, Alan MacDougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > My understanding of inheritance is that I should not need to explicitly > call the superclass constructor as long as I'm not overriding or > extending that method of the superclass. What gives? Is it a language > quirk?
Nope, not a language quirk - your parent constructor doesn't know what parameter it should use for 'clip', so you have to explicitly state it. It's the same in Java, IIRC. Ian _______________________________________________ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
