As far as the 205 form is concerned there are two versions in use predominantly both of which are accepted versions. What we have to decide is which template we feel best meets the needs. The formats are the same but wording as you noted varies. These also may change as we move forward and Federal Agencies continue to evolve in response requirements.
We probably need more feedback from our EmComm and Agency users to guide us as to most updated changes. This is a good example. I have 3 different ICS form tools provided by different groups FEMA being one and all have some variances from form to form. The formats are all the same but wordings may vary. I look forward to everyones input. Thanks for bringing this to the forefront. Mike On Nov 7, 2010 12:24 PM, "Dave Kleber" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I just noticed in the new release of FLMSG 1.1.0, under the > NTS/Radiogram form, periods in the message body are now being converted > to "DOT" rather than "X" after the check button is clicked. I apologize > for not catching this on the alpha. I just came across this during our > 80m net this morning when sending a message to one of our checkins. > > Also, on the ICS-205 form, the FEMA version of the form states > "System/Cache" for the first column rather than "Radio Type" as it does > in FLMSG. > > -Dave, KB3FXI > > _______________________________________________ > fldigi-alpha mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fldigi-alpha
_______________________________________________ fldigi-alpha mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fldigi-alpha
