Dick et.al. I absolutely agree. With the advent of WINMOR/RMS, that more than meets the needs. It would be a significant step backwards and one that I certainly don't support.
Kirk, K6KAR -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dick Kriss Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 8:12 PM To: fldigi alpha Subject: Re: FLDIGI and Packet Operation I don't understand the recent interest in packet. It was a big deal in the late 80's and I even hold HF Packet WAS Certificate #5. We all had TNC's but the technology was just too slow because FCC would only let us use 300 baud on HF. The advent of the internet and reliable email killed jnos and other BBS system and Packet. I gave away my PK-232's. What's with all of the renewed interest? I have no plan to ever use ax.25 again and do not appreciate the need for adding it into fldigi. Dick AA5VU _______________________________________________ fldigi-alpha mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fldigi-alpha _______________________________________________ fldigi-alpha mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fldigi-alpha
