On Feb 16, 2012, at 12:39 AM, Omar Gonzalez wrote: > I'm not really seeing any opposition to FlexUnit and Mockolate as the unit > testing and mocking libraries we should adopt. Unless I get some objections > before EOD tomorrow I'm going to assume we've reached a consensus on this > and add some verbiage to the project site to communicate which libraries > we'll be working with for unit testing the framework. > > -- > Omar Gonzalez > s9tpep...@apache.org
Hi Omar, sorry for the late response. In addition to this post I also saw some conversation on some commits from you regarding this verbiage. Two reasons for my tardiness: 1. Been swamped with tons of client work lately. 2. This was marked as [DECISION]. Seeing this post makes me wonder, can we here at Apache Flex adopt something holistically without a [VOTE] thread? To be quite honest this mailing list is so busy that when I get busy as in #1 above, I have a tendency to skim my inbox for threads marked with [VOTE]. That being said, I'm personally not contesting FlexUnit and Mockolate, but on the other hand can we realistically say that something has been adopted into the project without a proper [VOTE] thread? Maybe one of the mentors can set me straight?
